Taper Madness Forum Index Taper Madness
Embrace the Madness! Marathon Training...and much more!!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Oh Jimmy Jam...

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Taper Madness Forum Index -> Madness
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:56 pm    Post subject: Oh Jimmy Jam... Reply with quote

...have you seen any good movies lately? It seems that it's been fairly bleak for the last couple of months, although I did see Crazy Heart twice more, on airplanes. That was a high point. But I also saw Valentine's Day and that Sarah Jessica Parker and Hugh Grant abomination (something with Morgans in the name), so I'd say a big net thumbs down for the airline offerings.

We saw Harry Brown a couple of weeks ago after seeing some critical acclaim for it, and found nothing redeeming about it at all. I love Michael Caine, but this was just an ugly, dark movie. But last Saturday made up for it: Toy Story 3. Who knew? Maybe I am regressing. One of the movies I liked best last year was the animated film "Up", and now I think "Toy Story 3" is the best I've seen in the theatres this year. Go figure.

What have I missed that is worth catching?
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
EatDrinkRunWoman



Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 632
Location: Seattle

PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We just watched "The Illusionist" through Netflix; I really enjoyed it.
_________________
- Betsy, Maniac #1077
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Andy



Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 176
Location: Arizona

PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think Harry Brown was supposed to be an ugly dark movie - didn't you think that Michale Caine's performance was a redeeming feature?

You might try "Exit Through the Gift Shop" with Banksy showing he can make films to the same standard that he can decorate buildings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andy wrote:
You might try "Exit Through the Gift Shop" with Banksy showing he can make films to the same standard that he can decorate buildings.


This is one I wanted to check out Andy, but it only played in one theater in the city, and I never got around to it. Probably because I'm not that intrigued by street art. But at least I wanted to see it because it's been a long time since I've seen anything I would call great.

Yeah Judy, it's been a down year, I think.

2 exceptions, however, are foreign language films: The Secret in their Eyes and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. The former won the Oscar for best foreign film, and the later is based on the book (the Millennium trilogy, actually) that the entire world seems to be reading. Both have a murder mystery as the central plot, but each utilizes various subplots to keep everything moving & interesting.

The Secret in their Eyes tells the story of an Argentinean detective obsessed with a brutal rape/murder of a beautiful young woman. The case is "solved" but not to the liking of the detective, who decides to revisit the case 25 years later. The second (female) central character was his DA boss back then, and who is now a judge. She too was intrigued by the case, and probably by the detective as well. But because of existing relationships, they never got around to pursuing that possible romantic interest. Until now. (The simmering relationship is great to watch unfold.)

The stories are told in dual time: the present and 25 years ago. The main characters are interesting & believable, and the film contains enough minor characters, plot twists, and beautiful cinematography to make the entire movie worthwhile.

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is like The Secret in their Eyes, but on crack cocaine. It too centers on an old murder mystery and contains an inordinate number of plot and subplot twists, some of which are resolved, and some aren't. (How else to set up the sequels?) It's long, complicated and brutal at times, but always interesting. In the nearly 3 hours, I never looked at my watch once. My only criticism of the movie is that the director seemed to linger over the many brutal rape scenes, but that's probably because the author, Steig Larsson, did the same. Ad nauseum. This might explain the movie's international title: Men who Hate Women.

The second in the series (The Girl who Played with Fire) opened in NY today. The 3rd will premier later this year, no doubt. There are plans of an American version of the trilogy, but I doubt if any be better than this Swedish product.

What else?...Nicole Holofcener's Please Give was pretty good. We hope to see Cyrus, and/ or Winter's Bone this weekend. I'll give a review if we do.

Oh yes, if you're not up for the high-brow murder mysteries, Hot Tub Time Machine was a hoot, and it just came out on video. It's probably a bit too raunchy for you though, Judy.

I'll let you know if I think of any others. In the meantime, good luck at the video store.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks, Jimmy.

I had forgotten about The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Saw it a while ago with The Doctor, and can't add much to what you say about it. The Doctor saw The Secret in their Eyes when I was gone one week; I had forgotten about it. He liked it so much when he saw it that he said he would definitely see it again, just to make sure that I catch it. Haven't yet done that, so I need to see if it's still around or available yet on DVD.

I really don't have any interest in Banksy, either. Exit Through the Gift Shop sure has stuck around a long time, though.

I've also been wanting to see Please Give, but our timing has been off. In fact, the night we went to see it, there were tickets available, but only a few seats left, so we saw Harry Brown instead. I just saw a listing for it at a couple of second-run theatres here, so maybe I'll catch it in the next few days.

Hot Tub Time Machine? Oh lord. But too raunchy? Hmmmm. Hard to say. I loved The Hangover, but thought a bunch of others (Knocked Up, Forgetting Sarah Marshall, etc.) not worth the time. Which camp is that one in?
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Andy



Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 176
Location: Arizona

PostPosted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just got back from seeing Knight and Day - I was in the mood for a mindless movie but unfortunately it didn't even rise to that level.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
T. Musacchio



Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 879
Location: The U.S. of A.

PostPosted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judy Denver wrote:
Hot Tub Time Machine? Oh lord. But too raunchy? Hmmmm. Hard to say. I loved The Hangover, but thought a bunch of others (Knocked Up, Forgetting Sarah Marshall, etc.) not worth the time. Which camp is that one in?


I loved the Hangover and enjoyed - but did not love - Hot Tub Time Machine. It was amusing and I didn't think it was too raunchy, it just lacked something that pushed it over the edge. I enjoyed Forgetting Sarah Marshall (the musical at the end made all the slower parts worthwhile) and found Knocked Up stupid. If that helps you decide re: HTTM.

While we're on silly guilty pleasure films, I HATED HATED HATED Get Him to the Greek. It was just stupid and boring. There were a few laughs, but it felt like it went on for about four long, tedious hours.
_________________
-Tracy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a tough time differentiating between a lot of the comedies mentioned, like Hangover, I Love You, Man, Sarah Marshall, Knocked Up, Superbad, (didn't see Greek) and finally, Hot Tub Time Machine. They were all raunchy & mindless, but really funny and I liked them all. What makes some of them stand out over the others are either really great, unusual characters, like Zach Galifianikas in The Hangover, or the McLovin character in Superbad, or the soft side of Sarah Marshall, or the bonus vampire musical scene that Tracy mentioned.

What I really liked about HTTM was that even they made fun of the stupid concept, ( a hot tub that's a time machine?) plus it had great characters/performances by people like Craig Robinson, and Rob Corddry in particular. Those guys left John Cusack standing in their dust. And then it had that great 80's soundtrack to boot. So, what's not to like? Yeah, it's dumb and mindless, but at least you leave the theater smiling.

A few films I'm looking forward to seeing over the next few weeks are: Restrepo, the Sebastian Junger (the Perfect Storm) movie about the Afghan war, The Kids are All Right, staring Annette Bening, Mark Ruffalo, and one of my all-time favorites, Julieanne Moore. I think it opens next week. Also due out soon is Chris Nolan's Inception, with an all star cast featuring Leo DiCaprio, Ellen Page (Juno), Joseph Gordon-Levitt (500 Days of Summer), Michael Caine (in everything), Ken Watanabe (The Last Samurai), Marion Cotillard (Edith Piaf in La vie en Rose), Pete Postlethwaite (Kobayashi in The Usual Suspects) and Cilian Murphy (he's also in everything). For this venture, I hope Nolan was inspired more by Memento, than Batman, the Dark Knight.

Also receiving rave reviews is Tilda Swinton in the Italian movie I am Love. And I'm really looking forward to taking Stella to Toy Story 3. I should have bought stock in Pixar Studios years ago. They seem incapable of doing anything wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jimmy - if you haven't managed it yet this weekend, *do* go see Cyrus. What a surprise treasure! I hadn't heard of it until your post, but then saw it listed at my local Landmark theatre, so I put it on my schedule today. It's just a nice quirkly little film with a small but superb cast (I'll let you fill in the details for anyone else - you're the reviewer around here). I hope you like/liked it as much as I did.
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judy Denver wrote:
Jimmy - if you haven't managed it yet this weekend, *do* go see Cyrus. What a surprise treasure! I hadn't heard of it until your post, but then saw it listed at my local Landmark theatre, so I put it on my schedule today. It's just a nice quirkly little film with a small but superb cast (I'll let you fill in the details for anyone else - you're the reviewer around here). I hope you like/liked it as much as I did.


We're seeing it tomorrow, Judy.

We usually try to see John C. Riley movies because Julie used to do local theater with him back in the day. She says he used to be quite the party animal. "Quirky" Yeah, that's what the previews look like. We're looking forward to it.

Hey, did you ever see Greenberg? It's the Ben Stiller movie written & directed by Noah Baumbach (Squid & the Whale, Margot at the Wedding, Fantastic Mr. Fox (writer) The Life Aquatic)) It came out in the Spring and we never got around to seeing it. I heard the Ben Stiller character is really hard to like, but the movie's good otherwise.

I hated Margot at the Wedding. Jiggly camera, 3 days of festivities for people I hated. And, we saw so much of them over that wedding weekend, I felt I owed them a gift!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice call on The Secret in Their Eyes! What a nice and thought-provoking movie. I'm actually wondering how they pulled off the dual ages of those two main characters? The husband was easier to see, but the other two were really convincingly portrayed. Good stuff.

No, I didn't see Greenberg, but I saw the previews for it enough times that I probably saw the entire movie at least three times over. The Doctor had no interest. I was intrigued, but didn't really see any good reviews of it, so it slipped in and out of town without me seeing it.

I missed Margot at the Wedding. Wasn't that released sometime in the same timeframe as Rachel Getting Married? I really didn't like the Rachel movie (too transparent, too many whiny characters, too much kitchiness for the sake of trying to be quirky but just actually being annoying), and I think I kind of combined the two in my mind. Sounds like I didn't miss anything.
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
goober



Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Posts: 78
Location: Columbus OH

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With two young children I regret that I can't add too much to the grown-up discussion (the last grown-up movie we watched was The Hurt Locker, through NetFlix). I can however, say without equivocation, that I hated The Karate Kid (The Jaden Smith version). Jackie Chan did an admirable job of trying to re-create the Pat Morita/Mr. Miyagi character, but Jaden Smith is no Ralph Macchio (think about that for awhile). Also, the attempt at re-creating the Ralph Macchio/Elizabeth Shue romance with two kids who appeared to be all of 11 just kinda creeped me out. If Ralph Macchio were dead (he isn't, is he?) he would be spinning in his grave.

Toy Story 3 is probably next on our list, and I hear it is excellent!
_________________
"Most people never run far enough on their first wind to find out they've got a second." -- William James
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
1L



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 7590
Location: Hotlanta, GA!

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Toy Story 3 was fun and I really enjoyed it as did the 5 teenagers that I brought with me.

I just saw An Education the other night, and I liked it as well. You won't get an eloquent review from me as my command of the English language is that of an engineer, but it was well done and entertaining. I think it is available on DVD.
_________________
-Miles of smiles, M i c h e l e

They are the sandbaggers, we are the sandbags - No Twitch Muscles 11/17/07

Marathon Total: 36; States: 22; Provinces: 1; Countries: 2

Maniac #795
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1L wrote:
Toy Story 3 was fun and I really enjoyed it as did the 5 teenagers that I brought with me.

I just saw An Education the other night, and I liked it as well. You won't get an eloquent review from me as my command of the English language is that of an engineer, but it was well done and entertaining. I think it is available on DVD.


Yes, we saw An Education in the theatre last year, and The Doctor and I both really liked it. In fact, we were just talking about it the other day. You know it's a good film when you are still discussing the issues raised and the performances many months later.
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Julie Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 4152
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

goober wrote:
Jaden Smith is no Ralph Macchio (think about that for awhile).

If Ralph Macchio were dead (he isn't, is he?) he would be spinning in his grave.


I had such a crush on Ralph Macchio growing up. I would stare at his Tiger Beat picture for hours.

And no, he's not dead. He just had a small reoccurring role on Ugly Betty. And I'm sure his acting skills on Betty were just as spectacular as those in his earlier Karate Kid days.
_________________
Julie K.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
goober



Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Posts: 78
Location: Columbus OH

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did anyone see "A Serious Man" (start to finish that is)? Mrs Goober and I couldn't make it all the way through. I think she lasted a little longer than I who gave up and began to read the newspaper less than half way through, but both of us felt like we had spent an hour+ that we could have been doing something more satisfying like re-grouting the tub. Having a Best Picture nomination, we thought it would at least hold our attention. If I'm just too pedestrian would someone please enlighten me, I'd be willing to give it another chance if I had a clue where the hell it was taking me.
_________________
"Most people never run far enough on their first wind to find out they've got a second." -- William James
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

goober wrote:
Did anyone see "A Serious Man" (start to finish that is)? Mrs Goober and I couldn't make it all the way through. I think she lasted a little longer than I who gave up and began to read the newspaper less than half way through, but both of us felt like we had spent an hour+ that we could have been doing something more satisfying like re-grouting the tub. Having a Best Picture nomination, we thought it would at least hold our attention. If I'm just too pedestrian would someone please enlighten me, I'd be willing to give it another chance if I had a clue where the hell it was taking me.


I suffered through the entire thing, but only because I saw it in a theatre and a movie has to be quite an abomination before I walk out. The performances were good, to be sure, but I thought the movie was about as slow-moving as you can get and still call it a moving picture. There was a twist right at the end that seemed to come from out of left field - from an entirely different film. I think this was Tom Ford's first time out as a director, and it showed - it was all about style, not really about telling a story. I'm guessing that Jimmy may have more to say about it - but I agree with you - I wouldn't waste any more time on it.
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

goober wrote:
Did anyone see "A Serious Man" (start to finish that is)? Mrs Goober and I couldn't make it all the way through. I think she lasted a little longer than I who gave up and began to read the newspaper less than half way through, but both of us felt like we had spent an hour+ that we could have been doing something more satisfying like re-grouting the tub. Having a Best Picture nomination, we thought it would at least hold our attention. If I'm just too pedestrian would someone please enlighten me, I'd be willing to give it another chance if I had a clue where the hell it was taking me.


I had A Serious Man in the close but no cigar category from 2009. Here's the post: http://www.tapermadness.org/tm_phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=10987

I was very disappointed in the movie also. What did it in for me (us, actually, as Julie hated it too) was the incredibly bleak story. I really like & admire the Coen Brothers as film makers (writers as well as directors) and A Serious Man was a very well constructed film. I just hated the message, which I took to be: life sucks, and just when you think things can't get worse, they will.

So sitting through a neatly put together movie, with great scene after great scene (the dentist chair scene, the dinner table scene with the wife's new boyfriend, the visitations with the 3 rabbi's, the kid high at his own bar mitzvah) only to be hit over the head with such a dour message at the end, was a major disappointment.

I read where this was a very personal film for the Coen's, and that they used the bible's story of Job as inspiration. But this was much more depressing than anything Job had to endure, because at least he got some measure of redemption at the end. That didn't happen in here. A Serious Man offered no one salvation or redemption. I like happy endings, or at least good messages. This movie had neither.

Speaking of messages, Michele, you mentioned An Education. It was #8 on my top 10 list, and everything about it was great, but what really impressed me about the film was that they didn't make her out to be a victim. The message here was: you can be seduced by a con man, but you can make something positive out of it. You can learn from your mistakes, and I guess that explains the movie's title.

Judy, we both loved Cyrus. Really good, odd, little love triangle of a movie. Your word "quirky" describes it best.

The story is simple enough: a very honest & vulnerable man (John C. Riley) down on his luck in life & with the ladies meets a bubbly, beautiful woman at a party (Marisa Tomei) She admires his honesty. He admires her beauty, and his good fortune because they end up spending the night together.

He is quick to express his interest, while she can only say her life is "complicated," and it is, not by a husband, but by a very needy 21-year-old son (Jonah Hill) who does his best to sabotage the romance. It's the growth of this relationship, between the suitor & the son, that's the centerpiece of the rest of the film. Their co-existence is not a given, however, otherwise there would be no conflict within the story. Suffice to say that I like happy endings, and I like the way this movie ended. We particularly liked how John Riley"s character realized he was the Johan Hill character in his relationship with his ex-wife, nicely played by the talented & underused Catherine Keener. Does she ever make a bad film?

I'm going to try to see Winter's Bone, The Kids are All Right, and Restrepo this month. Hopefully they will make up for what is otherwise a bad movie year.


Last edited by Jimmy Jam on Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:13 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judy Denver wrote:
goober wrote:
Did anyone see "A Serious Man" (start to finish that is)? Mrs Goober and I couldn't make it all the way through. I think she lasted a little longer than I who gave up and began to read the newspaper less than half way through, but both of us felt like we had spent an hour+ that we could have been doing something more satisfying like re-grouting the tub. Having a Best Picture nomination, we thought it would at least hold our attention. If I'm just too pedestrian would someone please enlighten me, I'd be willing to give it another chance if I had a clue where the hell it was taking me.


I suffered through the entire thing, but only because I saw it in a theatre and a movie has to be quite an abomination before I walk out. The performances were good, to be sure, but I thought the movie was about as slow-moving as you can get and still call it a moving picture. There was a twist right at the end that seemed to come from out of left field - from an entirely different film. I think this was Tom Ford's first time out as a director, and it showed - it was all about style, not really about telling a story. I'm guessing that Jimmy may have more to say about it - but I agree with you - I wouldn't waste any more time on it.


Doh! I was thinking A Single Man, not A Serious Man. My bad. Truth is, I didn't like either movie.
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judy Denver wrote:
goober wrote:
Did anyone see "A Serious Man" (start to finish that is)? Mrs Goober and I couldn't make it all the way through. I think she lasted a little longer than I who gave up and began to read the newspaper less than half way through, but both of us felt like we had spent an hour+ that we could have been doing something more satisfying like re-grouting the tub. Having a Best Picture nomination, we thought it would at least hold our attention. If I'm just too pedestrian would someone please enlighten me, I'd be willing to give it another chance if I had a clue where the hell it was taking me.


I suffered through the entire thing, but only because I saw it in a theatre and a movie has to be quite an abomination before I walk out. The performances were good, to be sure, but I thought the movie was about as slow-moving as you can get and still call it a moving picture. There was a twist right at the end that seemed to come from out of left field - from an entirely different film. I think this was Tom Ford's first time out as a director, and it showed - it was all about style, not really about telling a story. I'm guessing that Jimmy may have more to say about it - but I agree with you - I wouldn't waste any more time on it.


A Serious Man, or A Single Man? Both came out at the tail end of last year.

You're right, A Single Man was Tom Ford's first attempt at film making, and I agree that it was all about the look & feel of the era (1960's LA) where a closet gay man had suffer internally at the loss of his lover. Colin Firth was brilliant and Julieanne Moore was almost equally as great in her too-few scenes. But that film was slow, to say the least.

I understand the confusion however, because having read your post about Rachael Getting Married and Margot at the Wedding, I realized I too was confusing those 2 movies. Title here, subject matter there, all have common denominators. They all sucked.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Doctor F



Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 8495
Location: The Empire State

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jimmy, please put a spoiler alert before your description of Cyrus. Sad
_________________
http://www.teamcoco.com/poster
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ksimkoid



Joined: 08 Jul 2005
Posts: 569
Location: Boise, Idaho

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Late to this party a bit, but can I enjoy and follow Toy Story 3 if I haven't seen 1 or 2? It's on the short list for a movie date with the granddaughter this weekend after a half marathon on Saturday - Despicable Me is the other one under consideration.
_________________
Kathleen

Carpe Diem!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ksimkoid wrote:
Late to this party a bit, but can I enjoy and follow Toy Story 3 if I haven't seen 1 or 2? It's on the short list for a movie date with the granddaughter this weekend after a half marathon on Saturday - Despicable Me is the other one under consideration.


Having seen both previous Toy Story movies, I may not be qualified to answer, but I do think #3 stands on its own. There are a few references to earlier movies/events/etc., but I think you won't even know what you've missed. It's a really nice movie.
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judy Denver wrote:
ksimkoid wrote:
Late to this party a bit, but can I enjoy and follow Toy Story 3 if I haven't seen 1 or 2? It's on the short list for a movie date with the granddaughter this weekend after a half marathon on Saturday - Despicable Me is the other one under consideration.


Having seen both previous Toy Story movies, I may not be qualified to answer, but I do think #3 stands on its own. There are a few references to earlier movies/events/etc., but I think you won't even know what you've missed. It's a really nice movie.


I completely agree. We took Stella to this over the weekend and loved it. We all loved it. It's funny, action packed, suspensful and heart-warming. A real testament to good screenwriting. What a great story. Rare is the film that can captivate a 2 year old, and leave her parents in tears at the end. It's perfect for toddlers, kids, teenagers and adults alike. It's what good movie making is all about. I can't say enough about it. See it.

Another really good film is Winter's Bone. It's not the easiest film to sit through because of the bleak nature of the subject matter, but it's one of those films that lingers with you long after the credits roll. I saw it on Friday and thought about all weekend.

Winter's Bone tells the simple story of a young girl's quest to find her father in the backwoods of the Ozarks. Her meth-head father is on the lam, and her mother is mentally disabled. Forced at too young an age to care for her brother & sister, she learns that her father posted their meager property as bail, and all will be forfeited if he doesn't show up on his trial date. She searches for him, but encounters resistence from all. Unwilling to follow their advice to give up, she continues.

The movie works because it touches on universal themes like survival, family loyalty, and gender kinships. Neither men nor women are portrayed particularly well, but the 17 year old girl at the center of the movie is. She's played by 19-year old Jennifer Lawrence, and she's terrific. I think she'll get an Oscar nomination for this role. (John Hawkes as her uncle "Teardrop" is also fantastic)

I found Winter's Bone, at times difficult to watch, but impossible to forget. From the bleak reality of poverty-stricken rural America, to some of the most unforgiving characters & unforgettable lines in cinema this year, it's raw & unsettling. But it's also one of the year's best. It's director Debra Granik's second film, and she made an empowering film. And not just for women.

Finally, we saw the middle part of the Millenium trilogy, The Girl who Played with Fire. I really liked it, even though it's the second part of the story, it stands on it's own. It would help if you saw the first part first, but it's not necessary.

Typically second parts of trilogies are all middle, having to pick up where the first left off, and setting up the finale. Usually this presents a problem in the story telling, but I think the great script makes up for it here. Well, that and the unforgettable characters and the actors who play them.

I don't have enough time to delve into it right now, but suffce to say that we really enjoyed this film. In fact, all 3 films.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just saw Inception today. It's outstanding. We walked out of the theater with the same feeling we had after seeing Memento a few years back: totally blown away by it's originality.

Best movie of the year, so far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's another good one (finally! - maybe the tide is turning): The Kids Are All Right. Just saw it tonight, and it's a really solid film. How can you not like Mark Ruffalo? I saw an interview with him the other day, and even if he plays the same role a bit often, he's so good at it. I have never much cared for Annette Bening, but I love her in this movie. The story is, well, a 2000's kind of story, about two teenage kids of a lesbian couple who go looking for their sperm donor, and how that experience affects the lives of the five main characters. It's funny, but it's also touching and dramatic, too. There are some mixed moralizing messages in the film, but there are also some great observations on relationships. And even if you end up not liking the film much, you can at least enjoy a great soundtrack.
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
tom



Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 2027
Location: Northwest Indiana

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I average less than 1 movie per year, and the last two I've seen have been children's movies. We saw Toy Story 3 last weekend and I would second Jimmy's post 100%. All four of my kids (ages 3 to 12) loved it and both Alison and I enjoyed it too. I really enjoyed the nostalgia of many of the toys that I recognized but had not thought of in many years. Very nicely done.[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kent



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 3864
Location: The wrong end of a leash

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tom wrote:
I average less than 1 movie per year, and the last two I've seen have been children's movies. We saw Toy Story 3 last weekend and I would second Jimmy's post 100%. All four of my kids (ages 3 to 12) loved it and both Alison and I enjoyed it too. I really enjoyed the nostalgia of many of the toys that I recognized but had not thought of in many years. Very nicely done.


We average about the same, and even though we have no kids my wife is a kid at heart so it's typically children's movies when we do go. Toy Story 3 is on the docket for this weekend. I understand I'll need lots of kleenex for the last 15 minutes.
_________________
-k e n t

Running slow40 Hazelnut Butter Rutabagas Bulgur - the new tofu brussels sprouts ART Neti Pot 16 cool.
"I was a good kid, but it just seemed that most of the things I did were either stupid or illegal, go figure." - Evil Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tom & Kent (and other kids at heart) for family entertainment, these are a few of my favorites;

Fly Away Home http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0116329/

October Sky http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0132477/

And one of the most beautifully shot films ever (the first half is absolutely gorgeous) The Black Stallion http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078872/

And Judy, The Kids are All Right is the next movie we plan on seeing. Glad you enjoyed it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judy Denver wrote:
Here's another good one (finally! - maybe the tide is turning): The Kids Are All Right. Just saw it tonight, and it's a really solid film. How can you not like Mark Ruffalo? I saw an interview with him the other day, and even if he plays the same role a bit often, he's so good at it. I have never much cared for Annette Bening, but I love her in this movie. The story is, well, a 2000's kind of story, about two teenage kids of a lesbian couple who go looking for their sperm donor, and how that experience affects the lives of the five main characters. It's funny, but it's also touching and dramatic, too. There are some mixed moralizing messages in the film, but there are also some great observations on relationships. And even if you end up not liking the film much, you can at least enjoy a great soundtrack.


Finally saw it this weekend and loved it. It's timely, thought provoking, funny, sad at times, and as Judy said, has some great observations on relationships.

With the premise being a lesbian couple with kids from the same sperm donor, you might think the movie would quickly bog down into a cliche, but it doesn't. In fact, about 20 minutes into the film you're wondering how writer/director Lisa Cholodenko is going to hold it all together. She has many, many interesting characters and plot directions to go with, you think she might have bitten off more than she could chew. There's a lesbian couple, middle aged, with teenage kids, one (but not both) wanting to seek out their sperm-donor dad, who turns out to be a hunky, laid back, motorcycle riding restaurateur high-libido breeder, nicely played by Mark Ruffalo. Throw in the difficulty of staying in love & married after all these years, all the while navigating the uncharted waters of parenthood ...well, you get the picture. There's a lot going on

The fact that she does, indeed, hold it all together, and moves the various sub plots into unexpected directions, all the while making poignant observations about parenthood and relationships, is a credit to her as both writer and director. Cholodenko resurrected Ally Sheedy's career for a few minutes back in 1999 when she made High Art. Critics also liked her Laurel Canyon. The Kids are All Right is by far her best film and one I highly recommend.

Still, the best picture of the year is Chris Nolen's Inception. It's set in some unnamed time in the future, when humans are capable of penetrating into a person's subconscious in their dreams, and "stealing" their ideas. One could only imagine how this could make vulnerable trade secrets in the business world. One of the very best at utilizing this technique is our main character, Leonardo DiCaprio, who has been accused of causing the death of his wife (in this process) and is now in exile from his homeland. His only desire is to live quietly with his kids, back home.

Enter a Japanese businessman, Ken Wantanabe, who promises Leo just that, if he agrees to do "one last job," but this time with a twist. Instead of stealing an idea, Leo has to plant one in the person's subconscious through the untested process called "inception."

Leo agrees to do this, and then assembles a team to help pull it off. What follows is the mind-bending concept of navigating dreams within dreams. There are, in fact (I think) 4 parallel dreams going on at the end of the movie. But it's not impossible to follow, thanks in large part to the questions asked by, and the answers provided to the newest member of the team, Ellen Page (of Juno fame)

Incredibly original script with an all-star cast. If you thought Memento was original, Inception will blow you away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Trent



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 5198
Location: Deep Wells, TN

PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about Kick Ass and Scott Pilgrim?
_________________
It's all fun and games until the flying monkeys attack.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We saw Inception a week or so ago. Essentially, I liked it and thought it a good movie. What was good was the multi-layered story and all the complexities that it invoked, not least of which was the ending. Real or dream? No matter what you think, it's thought-provoking.

What I didn't like was all the shoot-em-up stuff. Criminy, the gunfire never ended. It wasn't that it was ultra gory (for all the shooting, there's really very little blood and guts), but it was just loud and obnoxious and distracting. It seemed that they put in the shooting and absurd chase scenes just to sell the film to 20-something boys.

Definitely well worth seeing, and definitely memorable. Best of the year? I hope not! ...but it's been a pretty slow year....
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trent wrote:
What about Kick Ass and Scott Pilgrim?


Haven't seen either one Trent, as I am not a huge fan of the comic book/graphic novel genre (although I really liked Sin City. How could you not like a movie that has Jessica Alba cage dancing in a halter top & chaps?)

Kick Ass didn't appeal to me, despite Matthew Vaughn's involvement in it. He wrote or directed or produced a couple of really nice films like : Stardust, Snatch, Layer Cake, and Lock, Stock & 2 Smoking Barrels. Yeah, he was involved in that Madonna/Guy Ritchie movie, Swept Away, but I figure he was drunk when he signed on for that piece of crap.

Scott Pilgrim I'd like to see, but it'll probably be a rental. Edgar Wright wrote the screenplay and directed it. He's the same guy who did 2 recent hilarious British comedies, Shaun of the Dead and Hott Fuzz. Both stared Simon Pegg and Nick Frost and were very funny. Shaun is a parody of zombie movies and Fuzz is a parody of a cop/buddy movie. Both are worth renting, especially Hott Fuzz. I still laugh everytime I think about the geese scene(s).

And Judy, I'm sorry you didn't like Inception as much as I did. I didn't find the shoot 'em ups and chase scenes distracting in the least. It's my best picture of the year, so far with Toy Story 3 a close second.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Judy Denver



Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3784
Location: Mile High City

PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jimmy Jam wrote:
And Judy, I'm sorry you didn't like Inception as much as I did. I didn't find the shoot 'em ups and chase scenes distracting in the least. It's my best picture of the year, so far with Toy Story 3 a close second.


Maybe I should edit my comments above to say "just to sell the film to ALL boys"..... Smile
_________________
"Through the years, I have learned that there is no harm in charging oneself up with delusions between moments of valid inspiration." - Steve Martin

Marathon Maniac #835. Check out my 50 states progress at: MarathonGeeks

Current Tally:
52 Marathons, 2 Ultras
40 States, 1 Province, 2 Countries, 1 Continent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jimmy Jam



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1688
Location: Evanston, IL

PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 6:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Get Low.

We saw it tonight and we both really liked it. It stars Robert Duvall as a crotchety old hermit named Felix Bush, who decides to throw a funeral party for himself. Only the twist is that he wants to be in attendance. As in alive. He also wants to invite many guests, the more the merrier in fact. The only catch is that they all have to tell a story about Felix, and you sense that not too many have good stories to tell.

Now if this were all there was to the plot, then the movie would still be ok. In fact all of what I just told you about the movie, you gather from seeing the previews. You might even sense that Felix himself has a story to tell. But what that story is, and how that story unfolds is what makes this film special. Well that, and the exceptional performances by Duvall, Sissy Spacek as a former love interest (great to see her on screen again) and a wonderfully droll Bill Murray as the funeral director. Murray has elevated deadpan humor into an art form. He's great.

Make no mistake, however, as this is Duvall's film. From Boo Radley to the Lonesome Dove, he's one of the best we have, and it's his finest work since his Oscar nominating performance in The Apostle. It wouldn't surprise me to see he, Murray and Sissy all receive nominations.

Director Aaron Schneider's background is in cinematography, and it shows in this film. His beautiful shots immerse you in 1930's rural America, and the bluegrass soundtrack only adds to the experience.

Get out to see Get Low. It's a good movie.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Doctor F



Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 8495
Location: The Empire State

PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judy Denver wrote:

What I didn't like was all the shoot-em-up stuff. ..


I was going to recommend "The Other Guys" with Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg until I saw your comment.
_________________
http://www.teamcoco.com/poster
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Taper Madness Forum Index -> Madness All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group